- Research article
- Open Access
Mandibular reconstruction using an axially vascularized tissue-engineered construct
© Eweida et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 30 November 2010
- Accepted: 20 March 2011
- Published: 20 March 2011
The Erratum to this article has been published in Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research 2012 6:4
Current reconstructive techniques for continuity defects of the mandible include the use of free flaps, bone grafts, and alloplastic materials. New methods of regenerative medicine designed to restore tissues depend mainly on the so-called extrinsic neovascularization, where the neovascular bed originates from the periphery of the construct. This method is not applicable for large defects in irradiated fields.
We are introducing a new animal model for mandibular reconstruction using intrinsic axial vascularization by the Arterio-Venous (AV) loop. In order to test this model, we made cadaveric, mechanical loading, and surgical pilot studies on adult male goats. The cadaveric study aimed at defining the best vascular axis to be used in creating the AV loop in the mandibular region. Mechanical loading studies (3 points bending test) were done to ensure that the mechanical properties of the mandible were significantly affected by the designed defect, and to put a base line for further mechanical testing after bone regeneration. A pilot surgical study was done to ensure smooth operative and post operative procedures.
The best vascular axis to reconstruct defects in the posterior half of the mandible is the facial artery (average length 32.5 ± 1.9 mm, caliber 2.5 mm), and facial vein (average length 33.3 ± 1.8 mm, caliber 2.6 mm). Defects in the anterior half require an additional venous graft. The defect was shown to be significantly affecting the mechanical properties of the mandible (P value 0.0204). The animal was able to feed on soft diet from the 3rd postoperative day and returned to normal diet within a week. The mandible did not break during the period of follow up (2 months).
Our model introduces the concept of axial vascularization of mandibular constructs. This model can be used to assess bone regeneration for large bony defects in irradiated fields. This is the first study to introduce the concept of axial vascularization using the AV loop for angiogenesis in the mandibular region. Moreover, this is the first study aiming at axial vascularization of synthetic tissue engineering constructs at the site of the defect without any need for tissue transfer (in contrast to what was done previously in prefabricated flaps).
- Parotid Gland
- Free Flap
- Biphasic Calcium Phosphate
- Autogenous Bone
- Facial Artery
Bone tissue has regenerative capabilities that enable the self-repair of fractures and tissue loss; however, in extreme situations in which the extent of bone loss or damage due to trauma, surgery, or a metabolic disease is too large, spontaneous complete regeneration cannot occur.
In most cases, two surgical procedures are necessary: one for bone harvesting (e.g., from the iliac crest) and the other for implantation. This can cause some patients to suffer from complications associated with the donor site.
One major reason for mandibulectomy and maxillectomy is oral cancer; an estimated 34,000 of such cases were anticipated in the United States in 2008 . In addition, approximately 1,600,000 bone grafts are performed each year to regenerate bone lost due to trauma or disease, of which 6% (96,000) are craniomaxillofacial in nature . Current reconstructive techniques for continuity defects of the mandible encompass the use of revascularized free flaps, free nonvascularized bone grafts, and alloplastic materials. Although revascularized composite flaps may be regarded as the "gold standard," they are associated with donor site morbidity [6, 7].
Tissue engineering methods designed to restore diseased and damaged tissues depend on the presence of a matrix structure (scaffold) that is amenable to cell growth and proliferation. In order to support the development of complex biologic structure, such biomaterials must effectively interact with the surrounding tissue and incite the host to populate the graft with new tissue. To accomplish this task, these matrices must either create-or induce the host to establish an early and aggressive angiogenic response leading to the development of a blood supply for the restoration of structure and function .
The majority of currently applied tissue-engineering approaches rely on the so-called extrinsic mode of neovascularization. In this setting, the neovascular bed originates from the periphery of the construct, which should be implanted into a site of high vascularization potential . This represents a major obstacle for bone regeneration in post irradiated regions. Furthermore, diffusion limits oxygen and nutrition supply to cells to a maximum range of 200 μm into a given matrix. That is why suboptimal initial vascularization often limits survival of cells in the center of large constructs . These issues of vascularization implemented the need for novel angiogenic approaches and new in vivo models evolved with the aim to generate constructs with a dedicated neovascular network not under the immediate influence of the local environment . In 1979 Erol and Spira reported about their work on vascular induction by means of inserting microvascular constructs onto free skin grafts. Several vessel configurations were investigated including a flow through vascular pedicle, a distally ligated arteriovenous pedicle as well as an arteriovenous (AV) fistula. The latter was found to possess the highest capacity of inducing and sustaining vascularization into the free skin transplant. As a result, a new tissue element was generated with a dedicated vascular network based on an arteriovenous axis. The axial vascularization of the new flap was similar to the pattern seen in tissue transplants suitable for microvascular transfer (free flaps). During the late 1980s the principle was refined and found a way into plastic surgical reconstruction under the collective designation of the so called 'prefabricated free flaps' . Recently, the superiority of the AV-loop as a vascular carrier for an axial type of vascularization has been clearly demonstrated [9, 13, 14].
We are introducing here a new animal model for mandibular reconstruction using intrinsic axial vascularization by the AV loop. In order to test this model, we have performed cadaveric, mechanical loading, and surgical pilot studies on adult male goats.
Our model is based on Cadaveric studies, mechanical loading studies, and pilot surgical studies. Qualitative and quantitative data on angiogenesis and osteogenesis, together with the long term follow up of this model are being further studied by our team.
• Cadaveric studies
We studied the mandibular and parotid regions in the goat aiming at good orientation of the anatomy, specially the vascular anatomy. Our goal was identification of the best vascular axis to be used in creating the AV loop. The study included 6 fresh cadaveric adult male goat heads; 3 right and 3 left.
• Mechanical loading studies and design of the defect
• Animal Surgery
In order to assess the feasibility of our model, and to insure smooth intra and post operative procedures, we performed a pilot animal surgery on a 3 year-old male goat. All the procedures were done according to the NIH guidelines for animal surgery . The animal fasted overnight. General IM anesthesia was induced using Xylazine HCl 0.22 mg/kg. 15 minutes later ketamine HCl IM was administrated at a dose of 11 mg/kg. The dose of Ketamine was repeated twice throughout the operation (every 25 minutes).
• Cadaveric study
• Mechanical loading studies
• Animal surgery
The study showed the feasibility of the surgical procedures to be done on the goat model under general anesthesia with minimal animal morbidity. The animal was able to feed on soft diet from the 3rd postoperative day and returned to normal diet in a week postoperatively. The mandible did not break during the period of follow up (2 months).
Based on the cadaveric, mechanical, and surgical studies, this model can be standardized as a safe efficient model for studying axially vascularized mandibular regeneration in large animals. The next step will be charging the scaffold with suitable growth factors e.g. BMP2 and establishment of the AV loop inside the scaffold then investigating the resulting angiogenesis and osteogenesis.
Radiotherapy is commonly used as primary treatment and as an adjuvant to the surgical excision of malignant tumours especially in the head and neck regions. While radiotherapy is an effective post operative measure in destroying potential residual cancer cells, its side effects are well-documented and include damage to normal epithelial, dermal, and endothelial cells . The resulting hypocellularity and hypoxic environment leads to scarring and fibrosis that make secondary reconstruction of the surgical site difficult. This further adds to the challenges against reconstruction using the modalities of regenerative medicine or tissue engineering. Regeneration at the central region of large constructs usually fails due to absence of adequate vascularization .
One tissue-engineering approach to the regeneration of bone involves the delivery of cell signaling factors such as growth factors or genes from biomaterial scaffolds. Growth factors such as VEGF, TGF-β1, and BMPs have been delivered to defects and have significantly improved bone repair in irradiated sites [17–21]. Other research groups tried sustainably expressing osteoinductive factors through cells that are transduced in vivo  in regenerating defects compromised by radiotherapy . However, these studies did not demonstrate clinically relevant complete regeneration of critical-sized defects in large animals. Furthermore, large doses are often necessary in protein-based therapies, which are extremely expensive and thus may be impractical for universal clinical application.
Other research groups started to address the issues of vascularization in order to be able to deliver clinically-relevant sized tissues with axial vascularization to the site of reconstruction [24–26].
The sheep groin AV-loop model was the very first large animal model for de novo creation of axially vascularized tissue using microsurgical techniques . That model was further standardized and axial vascularization was successfully induced in a large volume (16 cc) of a clinically approved biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic . Yet, all these trials aimed at axially-vascularizing constructs that would be later on transferred to the site of reconstruction.
Successful trials for mandibular reconstruction in clinically-relevant sized defects using the issues of axial vascularization have not been reported. The concept of axial vascularization of bones was previously introduced in research studies  and even in clinical practice in order to revascularize bones as in cases of avascular necrosis of scaphoid bone or Kienboeck's disease. These methods used either ligated vascular pedicles or AV loops with or without bone grafting [30, 31]. However, the concept of induction of axial vascularization of synthetic tissue engineering constructs at the very same site of reconstruction without the need for tissue transfer (with subsequent operative and microsurgical hazards accompanying tissue transfer) has not been introduced.
Our concept regarding axial vascularization of mandibular constructs is based on solid data in literature confirming the efficiency of using the AV loop model for axial vascularization of transplantable tissues [12, 13, 32]. In order to further evaluate this in the mandible, we introduced a new design of a mandibular defect in goats. The defect should have a critical size , and should significantly affect the mechanical properties of the mandible. However, the defect design should be as simple as possible in order not to add to the complexity of the procedure which involves micro-anastomosis inside the construct. The model aimed at minimizing the animal morbidity where there is no loss of mandibular continuity and intact oral mucosa.
Our studies showed that direct anastomosis of facial vessels allows the AV loop to be set in for reconstruction of defects in the posterior half of the mandible. Defects in the anterior half, however, may require a venous graft between the facial artery and vein. The caliber of the facial vessels can allow anastomosis to be done easily using the surgical loupe or operative microscope.
Regarding the status of the mandibular region after cancer surgery and irradiation, our AV loop model can be quite suitable for further clinical applications. In most of the cases of head and neck cancers requiring mandibulectomy the facial vessels could be preserved. Being medium sized vessels, the facial vessels can be used even after exposure to irradiation as recipient vessels for free flaps  and thus can be technically suitable to construct the AV loop.
The study showed that the 3 points bending mechanical test is a simple and feasible method for testing the region of the angle of the mandible in our defect model. Although the test does not mimic the normal physiological stresses on the goat mandible, which is very difficult to analyze and simulate, it is efficient in detecting the difference in the strength between the normal and the resected mandible. This difference was shown to be significant. Applying this test on the regenerated mandible after explantation will provide information about the mechanical properties of the regenerated bone in the mandible in comparison to the normal and the resected mandibles.
Our pilot study showed the feasibility of the surgical procedures to be done on the goat model under general anesthesia with minimal animal morbidity.
We introduced a model for axial vascularization of a tissue -engineered mandibular construct using the AV loop. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to introduce the concept of axial vascularization using the AV loop for angiogenesis in the mandibular region. Moreover, this is the first study aiming at axial vascularization of a synthetic tissue engineering construct at the same site of the defect without any need for tissue transfer (in contrast to what was done previously in prefabricated flaps). Qualitative and quantitative data on angiogenesis and osteogenesis, together with the long term follow-up of this model is now being further studied by our team.
This work was funded by a research grant from the University of Alexandria (Alexandria University Research Enhancement Program; Alex REP, code HLTH-09). We would like to acknowledge with great appreciation the team of Tissue Engineering Laboratories; namely Ahmad Rashad, Mohamed Naguib, and Michael Samir for their assistance with the mechanical loading studies, Dalia Khamis and Ramy Hussein for their help with the animal care.
- Betz RR: Limitations of autograft and allograft: new synthetic solutions. Orthopedics 2002, 25: 561–570.Google Scholar
- Horch H, Pautke C: Regeneration instead of reparation. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2006, 10: 213–220. 10.1007/s10006-006-0004-xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Springer IN, Nocini PF, Schlegel KA, et al.: Two techniques for the preparation of cell-scaffold constructs suitable for sinus augmentation: steps into clinical application. Tissue Eng 2006, 12: 2649–56. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.2649PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- The Oral Cancer Foundation [on-line] [http://www.oralcancerfoundation.org/facts/index.htm] Accessed December 12, 2007.
- Einhorn TA: Basic science of bone graft substitutes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, October 8, 2003, Salt Lake City [on-line]. [http://www.hwbf.org/ota/am/ota03/bssf/OTA03BG1.htm], Accessed December 12, 2007.
- Rogers SN, Lakshmiah SR, Narayan B, et al.: A comparison of the long term morbidity following deep circumflex iliac and fibula free flaps for reconstruction following head and neck cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003, 112: 1517–25. 10.1097/01.PRS.0000082817.26407.86PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hartman EH, Spauwen PH, Jansen JA: Donor-site complications in vascularized bone flap surgery. J Invest Surg 2002, 15: 185–197. 10.1080/08941930290085967PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hodde J: Naturally occurring scaffolds for soft tissue repair and regeneration. Tissue Eng 2002,8(2):295–308. 10.1089/107632702753725058PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kneser U, Polykandriotis E, Ohnolz J, et al.: Engineering of vascularized transplantable bone tissues: Induction of axial vascularization in an osteoconductive matrix using an arteriovenous loop. Tissue Eng 2006, 12: 1721–31. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.1721PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goldstein AS, Juarez TM, Helmke CD, Gustin MC, Mikos AG: Effect of convection on osteoblastic cell growth and function in biodegradable polymer foam scaffolds. Biomaterials 2001, 22: 1279–88. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00280-5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Polykandriotis E, Arkudas A, Horch RE, Stürzl M, Kneser U: Autonomously vascularized cellular constructs in tissue engineering: opening a new perspective for biomedical science. J Cell Mol Med 2007, 11: 6–20. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00012.xPubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khouri RK, Upton J, Shaw WW: Prefabrication of composite free flaps through staged microvascular transfer: an experimental and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991, 87: 108. 10.1097/00006534-199101000-00017PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Polykandriotis E, Tjiawi J, Euler S, et al.: The venous graft as an effector of early angiogenesis in a fibrin matrix. Microvasc Res 2007, 75: 25–33. 10.1016/j.mvr.2007.04.003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Polykandriotis E, Horch RE, Arkudas A, et al.: Intrinsic versus extrinsic Vascularization in tissue engineering. Adv Exp Med Biol 2006, 585: 311–326. full_textPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals Published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH publication No. 85–23, revised 1996)Google Scholar
- Reuther T, Schuster T, Mende U, Kubler A: Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws as a side effect of radiotherapy of head and neck tumour patients-a report of a thirty year retrospective review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003, 32: 289–295. 10.1054/ijom.2002.0332PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khouri RK, Brown DM, Koudsi B, et al.: Repair of calvarial defects with flap tissue: role of bone morphogenetic proteins and competent responding tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996, 98: 103–109. 10.1097/00006534-199607000-00017PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Howard BK, Brown KR, Leach JL, Chang CH, Rosenthal DI: Osteoinduction using bone morphogenic protein in irradiated tissue. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998, 124: 985–988.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Würzler KK, DeWeese TL, Sebald W, Reddi AH: Radiation-induced impairment of bone healing can be overcome by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Craniofac Surg 1998, 9: 131–137.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ehrhart NP, Hong L, Morgan AL, Eurell JA, Jamison RD: Effect of transforming growth factor-beta1 on bone regeneration in critical-sized bone defects after irradiation of host tissues. Am J Vet Res 2005, 66: 1039–45. 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1039PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kaigler D, Wang Z, Horger K, Mooney DJ, Krebsbach PH: VEGF scaffolds enhance angiogenesis and bone regeneration in irradiated osseous defects. J Bone Miner Res 2006, 21: 735–744. 10.1359/jbmr.060120PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Franceschi RT: Biological approaches to bone regeneration by gene therapy. J Dent Res 2005, 84: 1093–1103. 10.1177/154405910508401204PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hu W, Ward B, Wang Z, Krebsbach P: Bone Regeneration in Defects Compromised by Radiotherapy. J Dent Res 2010,89(1):77–81. 10.1177/0022034509352151PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mian R, Morrison WA, Hurley JV, Penington AJ, Romeo R, Tanaka Y, Knight KR: Formation of new tissue from an arteriovenous loop in the absence of added extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng 2000, 6: 595–603. 10.1089/10763270050199541PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lokmic Z, Stillaert F, Morrison WA, Thompson EW, Mitchell GM: An arteriovenous loop in a protected space generates a permanent, highly vascular, tissue-engineered construct. Faseb J 2007, 21: 511–522. 10.1096/fj.06-6614comPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lovett M, Lee K, Edwards A, Kaplan D: Vascularization Strategies for Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng 2009,15(3):353–370. 10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0085View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beier JP, Horch RE, Arkudas A, et al.: De novo generation of axially vascularized tissue in a large animal model. Microsurgery 2009,29(1):42–51. 10.1002/micr.20564PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beier JP, Horch RE, Hess A, et al.: Axial vascularization of a large volume calcium phosphate ceramic bone substitute in the sheep AV loop model. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2010, 4: 216–223. 10.1002/term.229PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hori Y, Tamai S, Okuda H, et al.: Blood vessel transplantation to bone. J Hand Surg Am 1979,4(1):23–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bochud RC, Büchler U: Kienböck's disease, early stage 3-height reconstruction and core revascularization of the lunate. J Hand Surg Br 1994,19(4):466–78. 10.1016/0266-7681(94)90212-7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tamai S, Yajima H, Ono H: Revascularization procedures in the treatment of Kienböck's disease. Hand Clin 1993,9(3):455–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lokmic Z, Mitchell G: Engineering the microcirculation. Tissue Eng 2008,14(1):87–103. 10.1089/teb.2007.0299View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Viateeau V, Avramoglou D, Guillemin G, et al.: Animal Models for Bone Tissue Engineering Purposes. Edited by: Conn PM. New Jersey: Humana press; 2008:725–763. Sourcebook of models for biomedical research.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yazar S: Selection of recipient vessels in microsurgical free tissue reconstruction of head and neck defects. Microsurgery 2007,27(7):588–94. 10.1002/micr.20407PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.