Reference | Number | Treatment | Proportion of patients with preserved ovarian function | Follow-up (Months) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leonard A Farber [3] | 1 | Radiotherapy + LOT+LAR | 100% | 13 |
Hodel et al. [7] | 9 | RH+LOT±XRT | 78% | Ns |
Husseinzadeh et al. [8] | 22 | RH+LOT | 100% | Ns |
14 | LOT+XRT | 67% | ||
4 | RH+LOT+XRT | 50% | ||
Chambers et al. [9] | 54 | RH | 96% | 54(median) |
25 | RH+LOT | 96% | 36(median) | |
Chambers et al. [10] | 14 | RH+LOT+ Radiotherapy | 71% | 35(median) |
Feeney et al. [11] | 58 | RH+BSO±XRT | 0% | 24(mean) |
104 | RH+LOT | 97% | ||
28 | RH+LOT+XRT | 50% | ||
Covens et al. [12] | 3 | PLND+LOT+XRT | 66% | 25-32 |
Van Eijkeren et al. [13] | 36 | RH+LOT | 95% | 36-48 |
18 | RH+LOT+XRT | 72% | ||
Morice et al. [14] | 11 | RH+LOT | 100% | 31(median) |
59 | RH+LOT+Brachy | 90% | ||
35 | RH+LOT+XRT+Brachy | 60% | ||
Yamamoto et al. [15] | 30 | RH+LOT | 97/89% | At 12 v.s. At 60 |
26 | RH+LOT+XRT | 65/39% | ||
Buekers et al. [16] | 17 | Radiotherapy + LOT ±RH | 41% | At 12 |
Treissman MJ et al. [17] | 1 | Radiotherapy +LOT | 50% | 8 |